gadgetPhreak Gadget News Blog. Futuristic Gadgets and Portable Electronics

May 2, 2006

Sonos ZP100 system reviewed

Filed under:

src="http://www.engadget.com/media/2006/05/sonos_bundle.jpg" alt="" />Looks like HomeTheaterView got themselves a
hold of a couple of Sonos href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=zp100">ZP100s and a controller and put the spurs to ‘em to see how the
system works and performs in a real home environment. We have a Sonos we’re currently checking out (expect more on that
soon), but HomeTheaterView found the devices to work admirably out of box with a clean, labor-free setup, and simple,
intuitive interface, which we won’t deny. The concept behind the Sonos isn’t a terribly complicated one, so outside
decent codec support, wireless range, and the aforementioned (setup and interface / use), there’s not a lot else to
look for in an in-home wireless audio distribution system. Fortunately the Sonos nails the codecs (outside not
supporting PlaysForSure), but while the range wasn’t mentioned, and they wished there were versions outfitted for
in-wall installs and wetter environs like bathrooms, they seemed to find the system an excellent choice that fulfills a
need otherwise unmet by the other out of box consumer home audio distribution systems on the market.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

April 29, 2006

High powered TV-B Gone sniping hack

Filed under: Home Entertainment,HomeEntertainment,hack,tv,tv-b-gone — Ryan Block @ 6:12 pm

Filed under: ,

You know, we can't really imagine what kind of social setting you'd be in that would require the use of a TV-B-Gone and still be socially acceptable to carry binoculars, but if you're especially annoyed with your neighbor (whose TV happens to be relatively near and have line of sight), check out this simple TV-B Gone sniper hack. One TV-B-Gone plus one pair binoculars (monocular might also well work) equals some serious range -- about 40 feet according to the hack's creator. Anyone want to try this thing with a high powered home telescope? Forget WiFi-ing to other States, this week we're all about turning off TVs in the next time zone.

[Via Make Blog]
Read | Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

April 25, 2006

TiVo’s Series2 DT 80 and 180 hour dual tuner boxes

Filed under:

Remember the dual tuner TiVos we heard about a few weeks back? Well, surprise, surprise, they're real and are more or less exactly as called. The two models feature a single cable / RF in jack with internal splitter, which allows you to record two analog programs simultaneously, or one analog and one tuned from your digital cable box. Beside the fact that now your TiVo now has dual tuners, it (freaking finally) has integrated Ethernet; expect to pony up $199.99 for the 180-hour TCD649180, or $99.99 for the 80-hour TCD649080, both after $150 rebate and service activation. Baby steps to the Series3, patience people.


Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

April 20, 2006

The Clicker: The part of Blue that has me seeing Red.

Filed under: ,

Every week Stephen Speicher contributes href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?sourceid=Mozilla-search&q=the%20clicker">The Clicker, an opinion column
on entertainment and technology:

src="http://img.engadget.com/common/images/8927147503635671.jpg?0.2589625824213587" alt="" />99% of the time I’m just
your average mild-mannered tech-writer. However, every now and again, when the conditions are just right, I stroll
over to my bookcase, reach to the top shelf and gently pull the third book from the left, "Celine Dion: The
Magic Behind the Singing Horse."
This simple action puts into motion a Rube-Goldbergian series of events
which eventually reveals the secret passageway to my lead-lined den. It is there where I don my tinfoil hat and assume
the role of my alter-ego, Dr. Conspiracy Theorist.

Oh sure, the realist in me understands that the
motivations of large entities are, in truth, driven by the confluence of inertia and ignorance, and not instead by some
deep-seated hatred of my hopes and wishes. However, it’s an empowering (and self-aggrandizing) exercise to assume that
large corporations, governments, and even dictators are all out to screw me, the little guy.

Today, I
contemplate the ongoing Blu-ray / HD DVD war, and as I sit in this windowless bunker with only the sound of my
Remington striking the ink onto the page to keep me company, I ask the question that seems to be so often overlooked:
"Why isn’t there consensus on the red portion of the specs?"

It’s clear why neither the BDA
(Blu-ray Disc Association) nor the DVD Forum (HD DVD) will raise the white flag, capitulate, and end the blue-laser
war. In addition to having already invested years of research and development which they hope will lead to lucrative
licensing fees, there are also the intangibles that come from working with the beast you know. Dumping your format and
adopting that of your competitor is no small chore and despite the fact that we, the media and the consumers, like to
pretend that a blue laser is a blue laser – the two formats are quite different.

Having said that,
without the extra "Conspiracy Power" of the tinfoil hat, I found little reason why the two governing bodies
couldn’t come together and peacefully co-exist on something as well-understood as the red laser. With the hat, on the
other hand, it came to me – they’re trying to kill independent content.

But let’s back up for a
second.

You see — there are a couple of crucial pieces of information that you need to know. First, you need to
understand that one aspect of both Blu-ray and HD DVD that rarely gets press-coverage is that each has a provision for
using red lasers (the same type used in today’s DVD players) in conjunction with their advanced codecs. In the case of
Blu-ray it’s called BD-9 and in the case of HD DVD it’s HD DVD-9.

In each case, the concept is simple: it’s
nearly exactly the same content that’s placed on the higher-capacity blue-laser-based discs but instead the content is
put on the same DVD media that we’ve come to love and adore. The thought behind the inclusion of red lasers was
two-fold: a) in order to maintain backwards compatibility with current DVDs it had to be there and b) there is a set of
content that really doesn’t need all the space of the fully-implemented Blu-ray or HD DVD standard. As a result,
companies such as Warner Bros., in an effort to lower production costs on a certain subset of their content (e.g. TV
Episode compilations), demanded its inclusion.

The second piece of information that you need to understand
is that, in many cases, an entire HD movie will actually fit on a standard DVD. Yes, it’s true that at 8-9 MBit/second
you won’t see transparency to the source. However, for an average length film with no "extras" most people
would be hard-pressed to tell the difference; they have neither the equipment nor the eyes to do so. In fact, nearly
three years ago (a lifetime in terms of development) Terminator 2 was released on a standard DVD using a very similar
encoding scheme to those used in both Blu-ray and HD DVD . Since then, both the VC-1 encoding process and H.264
encoding have made tremendous improvements and continue to get more efficient with each passing month.
/>"So what’s the problem?" you ask, "both BD-9 and HD DVD-9 use the same laser, the same media, the same
codecs, and the same (well mostly) content protection scheme – why can’t you just make one disc that will play in
both players?" The answer, as stupid as it seems, is the navigation system. While nearly every aspect of the disc
is the same, HD DVD uses the Microsoft-developed iHD while Blu-ray uses a Java-based system. By using two different
navigation systems, both parties have excluded the possibility of dual-system HD discs.

"Why would they
do this?" Well… Many might argue that it was simply a case of NIH (not invented here) where two stubborn groups
were just unwilling to bend — each thinking they held all the cards. It’s only trained conspiracy experts who know the
real reason: doing so hurts independent content producers.

Where major studios have the clout, the finances,
and the time to release two different versions of the same content using the latest disks, independent producers don’t.
Doing so means twice as much inventory, twice as many production hassles, etc. Furthermore, it is the independent
producers (be they filmmakers or even home enthusiasts) who would have been more likely to utilize the red laser
feature. In the case of small production houses, they might already have invested in DVD-burners. In the case of
enthusiasts, they might choose to create a disc they know will be compatible with their friend’s HD player.

By limiting the usefulness of the red portion of the two specs, the DVD Forum and the BDA can push people
towards the discs that make them money and not towards a possible "HD on Red" compromise. Additionally, the
studios are able to limit their competition to only those companies which can afford to produce and stock all three
versions.

So there you have it – the "real" reason they sabotaged the red laser’s usefulness
in Blu-ray and HD DVD. Now I’ve to get out of this room; the tinfoil is making my head sweat and I’m out of saltines and
peanut butter.

If you have comments or suggestions for future columns, drop
me a line at theclicker@theevilempire.com.

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

April 19, 2006

AT&T to launch Homezone TV service

Filed under:

Just because AT&T's Lightspeed and the late SBC and BellSouth's nascent FTTH rollout (which they now own, in a manner of speaking) aren't yet ready to provide prime time IPTV to the masses doesn't mean they will be stopped from taking on cable companies every which way they can; enter their new Homezone service. Since the DSL they currently serve up wouldn't be quite broad enough to give AT&T what they need for a true live-IPTV experience, they're bundling it with live TV from DISH, movie downloads from MovieLink, older programming from Akimbo, and DVR functionality in a single 2Wire-built box. It may seem a little piecemeal, but we're a little surprised this kind of  home entertainment hodgepodge angle hasn't already been explored -- our only real fear here is whether AT&T and 2Wire will nail it when bringing so many kinds of user experiences into a single livingroom box.
Read | Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

April 13, 2006

Orb works TiVo with DVR Everywhere

Filed under:

Orb (finally) just officially took a page out of the Book of SlingBox today with the release of DVR Everywhere, their TiVo-streaming and controlling Orb add-on (not to be confused with TiVoAnywhere, that other Orb / TiVo add-on). Basically you'll get the same easy-to-use no firewall adjustments necessary Orb experience steamed to your laptop or portable in Real, Windows Media, or 3GP, but with recordings culled from your Series2 TiVo (which is also controllable by said software -- something also available for a while). Not quite as versatile as your SlingBox, which can pull video from just about any DVR device you can throw at it, but hey, it's a start -- especially if you've been considering that new dual tuner TiVo that we've been dangling from a string.

[Via PR Newswire]
Read | Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

April 12, 2006

TDK hard at work on 8-layer 200GB Blu-ray Disc

Filed under: ,

Since Sony, et al.'s hammered out the Blu-ray Disc spec, there's been speculation, theorization, and discussion of an 8-layer 200GB disc. Sony even supposedly had some working 200GB BRD demos way back in 2004. Well, now those mammoth coasters are in the works over at TDK, who apparently hope to commercialize the first presumably quad-layered dual-sided discs (or possibly octo-layered single-sided discs -- yeah, right). They're not giving it up as to when these discs could come out or how much they'll cost, but right now we're more worried about just getting our hands on some players, you know?

[Via TechDigest]
Read | Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

April 5, 2006

Netflix taking Blockbuster to court

Filed under:

Well, you know how we do in America: if ya can't beat 'em, sue 'em. Netflix is taking Blockbuster to court in California over the latter's online movie rental service, which, while suspiciously similar to Netflix, is certainly not the second DVD rental service available to consumers. We're a little perplexed as to why Netflix would only now be taking Blockbuster to court over their business methodology (i.e. their forming a company that does subscription-based online DVD rental by mail) seeking payment for damages and not, say, Wal-Mart (oh yeah, because they already took over Wal-Mart), but something tells us they're not looking for recompense so much as they're looking for Blockbuster to get the hell off their turf.
Read | Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

April 3, 2006

Sharp’s new 20-inch LC-20AX6 HDTV

Filed under:

href="http://64.233.179.104/translate_c?&u=http://www.watch.impress.co.jp/av/docs/20060403/sharp.htm"> vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.engadget.com/media/2006/04/aquos_20.jpg" />

Another
day, another Sharp Aquos gets announced — today it’s the
LC-20AX6, a simple livin’ 20-inch LCD HDTV featuring a 1,366 x 768 panel with a brightness of 500cd/m2, 1,200:1
contrast ratio, 8ms pixel response, integrated digital and analog tuners, and VGA, composite, and S-Video ins, among
others (sorry, no DVI / HDMI listed). No figure for a price tag on this thing (or if we’ll see it in the States), but
it sounds like a decent smallish mid-range set for broke city dwellers such as ourselves.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

« Previous Page
 
Built by WebNola New Orleans Web Design