gadgetPhreak Gadget News Blog. Futuristic Gadgets and Portable Electronics

November 20, 2006

Oregon man sues Acer, Gateway, et al. for violating hinge patent

Filed under:

Earlier this month, Mr. Khalil Zaidan of Portland, Oregon, sued Acer, Gateway, Toshiba, HP, IBM, and Fujitsu for violating his 1996 patent “Hinge Assembly for Electronic Devices.” A closer reading of the patent indicates that Zaidan seems to have patented the basic principle behind a tablet PC, allowing a computer to perform “rotational adjustment.” Still, the case — filed in United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division — seems like a pretty easy way to milk these big companies for some cash, given that tablet PCs have been around well before November 2006. Nevertheless, while Zaidan is asking the court for damages on patent infringement be decided in a jury trial, we’re betting that this gets settled out-of-court pretty quick. We’re pretty sure that if Zaidan could actually build a Commodore 64-esque tablet (that’s what his diagram is supposed to represent, right?), he could just make money from that instead of going through all this legal nonsense.

 

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments


BOLD MOVES: THE FUTURE OF FORD A new documentary series. Be part of the transformation as it happens in real-time

Office Depot Featured Gadget: Xbox 360 Platinum System Packs the power to bring games to life!

October 27, 2006

Apple updates patent for touchscreen device

Filed under: Apple,GPS,PatentFilings,cellphone,iPod,patent,patent filings,patents,uspto — Cyrus Farivar @ 12:28 am

Filed under: , , ,

Remember that Apple patent that we eyed back in early September? You know, the one that patented the merging of various electronic devices into a single gadget? Well, it’s back and better than ever before — it’s an update to U.S. patent application Serial No. 11/367,749, and is entitled “Multi-Functional Hand-Held Device.” So how’s this patent different from the last time? It’s not, really, but it provides a fair bit more detail written in that cryptic legalistic prose that we’ve come to know and love; it describes and displays the new interface, which may include various triggers along the edge of the bezel: “By way of example, the visual guides 180 in FIG. 4 include ‘Menu,’ ‘Power,’ ‘Left,’ ‘Select,’ ‘Right,’ etc. It will be appreciated that the visual guides 180 and their arrangement depicted in FIG. 4 are only exemplary. More or fewer visual guides 180 may be provided, and the size of the visual guides 180 can be larger or smaller than the scale depicted in FIG. 4.” Further, there’s a new portrait and landscape option described, handy for viewing photos or watching episodes of “Lost” while on the bus. But even the music-playing core of the iPod will get a makeover, coming in with an on-screen time slider, volume control, and other options that seem to be user-defined and customizable. We’ve still got questions as we did last time concerning prior art, but perhaps these newer details fill in the gaps. All in all, it would appear that the true video iPod (with possible cell phone or GPS add-ons) is still on the drawing board at this point, and it remains to be seen how these illustrations translate into reality. We’ve got some more patent diagrams of that portrait/landscape view and of the new “now playing” interface on the flip side, hot off the patent filing presses.

[Via MacNN]

 

Read | Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments


BOLD MOVES: THE FUTURE OF FORD A new documentary series. Be part of the transformation as it happens in real-time

September 8, 2006

SanDisk MP3 seizure at IFA overturned

Filed under: Sisvel,busted,ifa,lawsuit,lawsuits,mp3,patents,sandisk,sansa,violation — Darren Murph @ 4:02 am

Filed under:

Just a few days back, Sansa-manufacturer SanDisk was shot down by Sisvel and forced to take down its displays at Berlin’s IFA expo, but it seems that some fast-acting (and talking) lawyers have somehow reversed the decision just in time for SanDisk to show their products on the final day of the show. Tangled in lawsuits concerning MP3 patent violations, the company still insists its playback technology isn’t infringing on any patents, but Sisvel maintains its insistence that SanDisk should be included in the nearly 600 companies that pay royalties to the licensing firm. Apparently SanDisk wasn’t the only company forced to put its show on hiatus, as 19 other outfits had products unexpectedly seized for “similar violations.” Sisvel isn’t going down without a fight, however, as it has already filed an appeal to have the reversed order un-reversed — while it may seem a bit redundant (to say the least), it’s certainly not out of character for the sue-happy Sisvel, who proudly joins the growing list of “you’ve got to be kidding melawsuits.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

July 28, 2006

Samsung working on atmospheric broadcasting

Filed under: ,

You never know what you’ll find when digging through the US Patent files, and it has been discovered that Samsung has filed one of their own in hopes of using the atmosphere as an antenna. Researchers and employees in Korea are devising a method to use the ionosphere — the layer of the atmosphere at around 50 kilometers above the Earth’s surface — as a medium for “long distance communication” without the need for expensive satellites. The ionosphere already plays a role in communications as a “radio reflector” that bounces low frequency radio signals from sea to shining sea. But by launching UHF signals behind a 1GHz carrier signal, scientists hope to alter the behavior of the ionosphere to create an alternating current, which can then be modulated at a particular frequency in order to create an antenna of global proportions. While the precise utility of such an antenna is not yet clear, we’re glad it’s in the works, as this sounds like just the thing to solve those dropped call blues — or not.

[Via Textually]

Read | Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

July 17, 2006

Sony hit with another patent infringement suit

Filed under:

More legal woes for Sony: the computing and consumer electronics giant is being sued by Pennsylvania-based Agere Systems over a number of devices spanning several product categories that, you guessed it, may be infringing upon some eight different Agere patents. Specifically, Agere is claiming that the PSP, PlayStation 2, and PlayStation 3 — along with several Vaio, Handycam, Walkman, and Location Free TV models — are in violation of patents covering such varied technologies as a “wireless local area network apparatus” and “barrier layer treatments for tungsten plugs,” whatever those are. Furthermore, the integrated circuit component manufacturer believes that Sony “willfully” violated the patents, and is thus seeking damages that could end up being three times what non-willful infringements would warrant. For its part, Sony is putting up a multi-pronged defense: its lawyers are first trying to get a judge to invalidate all of the patents and make the whole mess go away quickly; but if they do turn out to be valid, Sony is claiming that it’s in the clear anyway due to cross-licensing deals dating back to 1989 with AT&T and Lucent Technologies (from whom Agere was spun off) that cover seven of the eight patents in question. Our uninformed legal opinion? Without knowing all of the specifics, it’s difficult to ascertain who’s got the stronger case here, but we can say that Sony’s recent track record in fighting infringement accusations hasn’t exactly been spotless, so as much as we’d love to cover yet another ugly, drawn-out court battle, maybe a quick settlement is the way to go with this one.

[Via PSP Fanboy]

Read | Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

July 6, 2006

European iPod Filings Confirm Apple Still Swiping Ideas

Filed under: Apple,iPod,iphone,patents — Gizmodo @ 6:02 am

Apple Insider’s lede is a bit daft: “A recent series of design filings made by Apple Computer suggests the company may have intentions of abandoning its Click-Wheel interface in future versions of its iPod digital music players.” Taken collectively, the interface designs are clearly a work of inscrutable Apple skullduggery, slapping up iPods with control surfaces stolen from a variety of media players, including those from Toshiba and Creative. It’s some some of intellectual property beachhead I’m too ignorant to fully understand (but not to recognize).

The only real bit of news is that Apple might be considering using the iPod nano chassis for the iPhone. Makes sense—plenty will purchase the iPhone on the merit of the iPod brand alone, but it won’t hurt to appeal to those looking for something smaller than the RAZR, currently The People’s Phone.

Apple filings reveal potential iPod redesigns [Apple Insider]

May 24, 2006

Patent system changes in the works?

Filed under: patent,patents,senate — Paul Miller @ 2:30 am

Filed under:

It doesn’t take the intellect of a US Senator to notice that there’s something wrong with our patent system, but it looks like those Senators might finally do something about it. Nothing has even made it out of committee yet, so the actual passage of a patent reform bill still seems quite far off, but there is definite talk going on in Washington as to what patent reform would look like, and there seems to be enough common ground for some good to come of it. The leaders of an intellectual property panel within the Senate’s Judiciary Committee had a hearing Tuesday to discuss ideas for new patent legislation, and it was well attended by panelists from tech, pharmaceutical, biotech, independent inventors, academics, and finance. There was plenty to say, and it seems most agree that there needs to be a new system to allow challenges to patents shortly after they’re approved in order to avoid costly litigation later on. Tech and financial service companies are also pulling for a second “window” to allow them to dispute patents once a patent infringement suit is filed, something that would’ve probably aided RIM in their recent fight. Not everyone else is so hot about this idea, so we’ll see if this makes it into the final legislation, but it seems any action towards reform would be helpful at this point, so we’ll take what we can get.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

May 5, 2006

James “father of the LCD” Fergason gets $500K award, defends patent-holders

Filed under: fergason,inventor,lcd,patents,westinghouse — Marc Perton @ 11:15 am

Filed under:

You may not know who James Fergason is, but chances are you’re reading these words on a screen that he helped to create. In the 1960s, while working at Westinghouse, Fergason developed many of the core technologies used in the production of LCD displays. In honor of his pioneering work, Fergason was just awarded the $500,000 MIT-Lemelson prize, an annual award for inventors. Fergason plans on donating the prize money to independent inventors, who he believes get the short end of the stick when dealing with large corporations. “I think that what they want to do is get something for nothing,” he said.” After working at Westinghouse, Fergason started his own business to commercialize LCD technologies, and helped create the first LCD watches, and today — not surprisingly — manages a company that licenses his patents to manufacturers.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

May 1, 2006

Patent holder Visto wants a share of that RIM pie

Filed under: ntp,patent,patents,rim,visto — Paul Miller @ 6:07 pm

Filed under: ,

You know, it has been a bit RIM-patent-fiasco-free around these parts lately. But no worries, since Visto has decided to whip up a bit (more) patent trouble of their own. Fresh off a victory over Seven Networks regarding the same four patents that they claim RIM is infringing, and already mired in legal fights with RIM competitor Good Technology and Microsoft, Visto is looking for more, and they think they can get a payout from RIM. Visto wasn't clear as to what RIM technology is infringing on their patents, but they do mention "Visto's intellectual property serves as the basis for this industry's birth." Quite the strong words when going up against RIM, who had a slight influence on the birth of the wireless email industry if our memory serves us right. RIM believes that the Visto patents are invalid, and that Visto's victory over Seven Networks was in regards to a different type of technology than RIM's. Their patents are also dated before Visto's, but there's really no telling where this could go after the fiasco the NTP case turned out to be. We'll keep you posted.
Read | Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Patent holder Visto wants a share of that RIM pie

Filed under: ntp,patent,patents,rim,visto — Paul Miller @ 6:07 pm

Filed under:

You know, it has been a bit RIM-patent-fiasco-free around these parts lately. But no worries, since Visto has decided to whip up a bit (more) patent trouble of their own. Fresh off a victory over Seven Networks regarding the same four patents that they claim RIM is infringing, and already mired in legal fights with RIM competitor Good Technology and Microsoft, Visto is looking for more, and they think they can get a payout from RIM. Visto wasn't clear as to what RIM technology is infringing on their patents, but they do mention "Visto's intellectual property serves as the basis for this industry's birth." Quite the strong words when going up against RIM, who had a slight influence on the birth of the wireless email industry if our memory serves us right. RIM believes that the Visto patents are invalid, and that Visto's victory over Seven Networks was in regards to a different type of technology than RIM's. Their patents are also dated before Visto's, but there's really no telling where this could go after the fiasco the NTP case turned out to be. We'll keep you posted.
Read | Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

April 19, 2006

Philips sues Kodak over patent infringement

Filed under:

href="http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?dist=newsfinder&siteid=google&guid=%7BF38B6A1D-363A-4642-9610-5EB71DEA4B6F%7D&keyword="> vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.engadget.com/media/2006/04/patent.jpg" />It’s
been a mixed day over at Philips: on the one hand, they had the pleasure of announcing a new offspring, href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/philips-spins-off-liquavista-to-develop-thin-electrowetting-disp/">Liquavista,
but now they’ve been forced to air some dirty laundry concerning fellow consumer electronics manufacturer Kodak, taking
the NY-based company to court for allegedly infringing upon a sixteen-year-old patent. Philips claims that while
several digital camera manufacturers license the JPEG compression technology protected by patent number href="http://tinyurl.com/q6bk3">4,901,075 (refer to the schematic above for all of the technical details), Kodak
refuses to do so, even though many of their products supposedly take advantage of the "Huffman codeword"
magic outlined within. Financial details of the suit have not been made public, but Kodak doesn’t sound like it’s going
to budge, saying that it will defend itself "vigorously."

[Via href="http://today.reuters.com/business/newsarticle.aspx?type=consumerProducts&storyID=nN19246085&imageid=&cap=">Reuters]

Read | Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

April 16, 2006

LG applies for “drawer phone” with motorized slider

Filed under: ,

LG has just filed a patent for a new type of slider phone wherein a motorized, protective covering containing the microphone and antenna slides up to reveal the screen and keypad, and of course, extend the antenna. Called a "drawer-type" phone, this design supposedly offers numerous advantages over traditional form factors, taking the best attributes of different phone styles while attempting to minimize their shortcomings. For instance, a drawer phone maintains the compact profile of a flip phone or slider while in a bag or pocket, while at the same time situating the mic closer to your mouth when in-use, a la some of the better candybar mobiles. You also get the screen protection and dual display benefits of a clamshell, because the sliding section contains a clear window, but none of the finger strain involved with manually opening and closing the flip. This design definitely seems to have its benefits, but since this patent has a long way to go before being approved, we're not sure when or even if we'll ever see it in production.

[Via Mobiledia]
Read | Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

 
Built by WebNola New Orleans Web Design